Everything about The Open Patent totally explained
The
open patent movement seeks to build a portfolio of patented inventions that can freely be distributed under a
copyleft-like license. These works could be used as is, or improved, in which case the
patent improvement would have to be re-licensed to the institution that holds the original patent, and from which the original work was licensed. This frees all users who have accepted the license from the threat of lawsuits for
patent infringement, in exchange for their surrendering the right to build up new patents of their own (in the specific domain for which the original license applies).
The open patent idea is actually quite old and has traditionally been practiced by
consortia of research-oriented companies, and increasingly by
standards bodies. These also commonly use
open trademark methods to ensure some compliance with a suite of compatibility tests, for example
Java,
X/Open both of which forbid use of the mark by the non-compliant.
Thus the model already has a strong legal framework. Patent improvement licensing is already practiced by some global institutions, notably the government of
China and
MIT. Each of these manage a large
patent portfolio and often require improvements to be licensed back as part of the original portfolio, although this isn't the default license.
Critics question whether the promoters of truly 'open' and mandatory improvement licensing, having spent most of their lives opposed to
software patents, can actually attract donors of patents, or would actually participate in a process that they claim to despise. This criticism probably focuses unduly on the personality and ideology of
Richard Stallman, who has nonetheless sought to solicit donors for such schemes. He found, not surprisingly, that software patent holders were not so interested in talking to him.
However, despite confrontation between Stallman/
GNU and the patent system, the open patent movement got going and attracted some support. It remains to be seen if it can become a major phenomenon - patents are difficult and costly to obtain and require extensive documentation, unlike copyrights. Patent rights on software and on life forms are controversial and many activists believe that they can successfully prevent such patent rights from existing at all, and so would be less inclined to patent and contribute to any such portfolio.
On October 12, 2001 the
Free Software Foundation and Finite State Machine Labs Inc. (FSMLabs) announced a
GPL - compliant open-patent license for FSMLabs'
software patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,995,745. Titled the Open RTLinux patent license Version 2, it provides for usage of this patent in accordance with the GPL.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Open Patent'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://open_patent.totallyexplained.com">Open patent Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
